当代汉语公共话语中的篇际互文性研究
2010-12
上海外语教育出版社
武建国
207
238000
篇际互文性是一种特殊的互文性，指的是特定语篇中不同体裁、话语或风格的混合与交融。通过这一重要概念，我们可以把语言分析和社会研究紧密结合起来。《当代汉语公共话语中的篇际互文性研究》由武建国所著，探讨了篇际互文性在当代汉语公共话语中的具体使用情况，以期更好地通过语言了解当今中国社会的发展状况。作者首先对篇际互文性做出明确的界定，对其历史渊源和现有研究路径进行了回顾和评述，然后在此基础上解释了当代汉语公共话语中篇际互文性的运作机制、使用动机和语用功效，为语用学研究和多维度的话语分析提供了一些宝贵的启示。本书涉及语用学、话语分析、文体学和社会学等诸多领域，内容丰富、例证翔实、脉络清晰、语言流畅，是国内篇际互文性研究的一项新成果，对相关专业的教师、研究人员以及研究生都具有较高的参考价值。
Chapter One Introduction
1.1 Introduction
1.2 The object of the present study: interdiscursivity
1.3 The rationale of the present study
1.4 Objectives of the present study
1.5 Notes on methodology and data collection
1.6 Outline of the book
Chapter Two A Review of the Relevant Literature
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Terminological issue
2.3 Types of interdiscursivity
2.4 Interdiscursivity as a special kind of intertextuality
2.5 Approaches to the study of interdiscursivity
2.5.1 Interdiscursivity in literary texts: the stylistic
approach
2.5.2 Interdiscursivity in non-literary texts: the CDA
approach
2.6 The perspective of the present study
2.7 Summary
Chapter Three A Description of the Theoretical Framework
3.1 Introduction
3.2 The delimitation of interdiscursivity
3.2.1 A working definition of interdiscursivity
3.2.2 Interdiscursivity versus intertextuality
3.2.3 Interdiscursivity versus generic intertextuality
3.2.4 Interdiscursivity versus heteroglossia
3.2.5 Interdiscursivity versus dialogicality
3.3 Basis of the theoretical framework
3.3.1 Problems in the existing studies on interdiscursivity
3.3.2 Studying interdiscursivity from a pragmatic approach
3.3.2.1 Overview of pragmatics
3.3.2.2 Pragmatics as a functional perspective on language
3.3.2.3 Verschueren's Linguistic Adaptation Theory
3.4 Essentials of the theoretical framework
3.4.1 Interdiscursivity as the result of choice making
3.4.2 Interdiscursivity as the product of dynamic
negotiation
3.4.3 Interdiscursivity as a means of linguistic adaptation
3.4.4 Interdiscursivity interpretation: tracing meaning
generation
3.4.5 Interdiscursivity as realization of communicative
functions
3.4.6 Variability ofinterdiscmrsivity
3.5 Summary
Chapter Four Mechanism of lnterdiscursivity
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Defining the notion of mechanism
4.3 The productive mechanism of interdiscursivity
4.3.1 Recontextualization
4.3.2 Transformation
4.4 The interpretative mechanism of interdiscursivity
4.5 Summary
Chapter Five Adaptability of Interdiscursivity
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Adaptability and adaptation revisited
5.3 Objects of adaptation
5.4 Interdiscursivity as adaptation to variables of the physical
world
5.4.1 Variables of the physical world
5.4.2 Analysis
5.5 Interdiscursivity as adaptation to variables of the
social world
5.5.1 Variables of the social world
5.5.2 Analysis
5.6 Interdiscursivity as adaptation to variables of the mental
world
5.6.1 Variables of the mental world
5.6.2 Analysis
5.7 Summary
Chapter Six Functionality of Interdiseursivity
6.1 Introduction
6.2 Defining the notion of functionality
6.3 Main trends of public discourse in relation to
interdiscursivity
6.4 Functionality of interdiscursivity in relation to discourse
commodification
6.5 Functionality of interdiscursivity in relation to discourse
informalization
6.6 Functionality of interdiscursivity in relation to discourse
technologization
6.7 Functionality of interdiscursivity in relation to
discourse democratization
6.8 Summary
Chapter Seven Conclusion
7.1 Introduction
7.2 Major findings
7.3 Limitations of this study
7.4 Suggestions for future research
Bibliography
Appendices
According to Verschueren （1987， 1999）， the central research questionguiding the research in the field of pragmatics is 'What do people do when usinglanguage？' In other words， pragmatics should be conceived as the study of themechanisms and motivations behind the linguistic choices and of the effectsthey have and are intended to have （Verschueren 1987： 14）. Inspired by this，the present study endeavors to achieve the following objectives： Firstly， to generate a coherent theoretical model based on Verschueren'sLinguistic Adaptation Theory for the analysis of interdiscursivity. ForVerschueren， 'using language must consist of the continuous making oflinguistic choices， consciously or unconsciously， for language-internal （i.e.structural） and/or language-external reasons' （1999： 55-56）， and verbalcommunication is a dynamic process of adaptation between linguisticstructures and contextual correlates. So this analytical model is to approachinterdiscursivity coherently from the four interrelated angles， namely， context，structure， dynamics， and salience. And it will incorporate the linguistic， socialand cognitive elements in exploring the functioning process ofinterdiscursivity.We believe this will certainly develop a new perspective for the understandingofinterdiscursivity in contemporary Chinese public discourse. Secondly， to present a systematic account of the generative and operativemechanisms lying behind interdiscursivity. Specifically， we will identifywhat genres， discourses， or styles are drawn upon in the interdiscursivetext under analysis， how they are mixed together and in what ways they areinterpreted. This identification needs alot of contextual information and isclosely related to levels of salience and metapragmatic awareness. Once theseinterconnections have been successfully established， we will then analyze thelinguistic structure and describe the meaning generation dynamics in order tobetter interpret this linguistic phenomenon. ……
《外教社博学文库：当代汉语公共话语中的篇际互文性研究》搭建学术交流平台，传播最新研究成果。学术理论新颖；研究领域广宽；材料客观翔实；论述周密严谨；文字简洁流畅。
书自己想看的书