国际政治理论
2012-10
知识产权出版社
王柏松
248
273000
《国际政治理论：范式与流派》对世界产生重大影响的国际政治理论范式与流派进行了系统的梳理与研究，内容涉及自由主义、现实主义、英国学派、建构主义、马克思主义、规范理论、女性主义、后现代主义、历史社会学及中国传统国际政治文化等宏观理论和思想。比较全面、系统地展示了国际政治学科中多变复杂的学术场景与知识谱系。
《国际政治理论：范式与流派》适用于具有一定英语基础并渴望对国际政治理论流派有更多解析的读者学习与研究所用。
王柏松，山东理工大学法学院副教授，东北师范大学政治学在读博士，主要从事政治学理论研究。发表论文30余篇。主编教材一部，出版英语专著一部。山东省第二批省级双语示范课程《国际政治学》项目负责人。
Chapter One Liberalism
Ideological Origins of International Politics Theories of
Liberalism
Hugo Grotius' thought of intemational politics
John Locke's thought of international politics
Jean-Jacques Rousseau's thought of intemational politics
Immanuel Kant's thought of international politics
Jeremy Bentham's thought of international politics
Idealism
Woodrow Wilson's thought of international politics
Alfred Zimmern's thought of international politics
John Murray's thought of international politics
Appraisement for idealism
Interdependence Liberalism
Defining interdependence
Joseph Nye and Robert Keohane's thought of complex
interdependence
Neoliberal institutionalism
Robert Keohane's international regimes theory
Oran Young's international regime theory
Republican Liberalism
Democratic peace theory
Michael Doyle's thought of democratic peace
Bruce Russett's thought of democratic peace
Chapter Two Realism
Legacy of Realism
Thucydides and the History of the Peloponnesian War
Niccolo Machiavelli and The Prince
Thomas Hobbes and the Leviathan
George Hegel's thought of realism
Max Weber's thought of realism
Classical Realism
E H Carr and The Twenty Years' Crisis
Reinhold Niebuhr's thought of Christian realism
Hans Morgenthau and Politics among Nations
George Kennan and strategy of containment
Raymond Aron and Peace and War
John Herz's thought between realism and idealism
Henry Kissinger and diplomatic thought of realism
Neo-realism
Kenneth Waltz and Theory of In,tern,ational Politics
Robert Gilpin and War an,d Change in World Politics
The New Development of Realism
Offensive realism
Defensive realism
Neoclassical Realism
Appraisement for Realism
Chapter Three Scientific Behavioralism
Chapter Four English School
Chapter Five Constructivism
Chapter Six Marxism
版权页： 插图： Carr wrote The Twenty Years' Crisis not to articulate a theory of realism, but instead to criticize British (and American) intellectuals for largely ignoring the role of power in international politics. He has made this point clear in the preface to the second edition: " The Twenty Years' Crisis was written with the deliberate aim of counteracting the glaring and dangerous defect of nearly all thinking, both academic and popular, about international politics in English-speaking countries from 1919 to 1939-almost the total neglect of power". For Cart, idealists held a hopelessly idealistic view of international politics, because they were determined to radically transform world politics and create a peaceful international order where statesmen cared about not the balance of power but morality, harmony of interests, international law, international organization and world government. The idealists seldom cared about the objective reality and even saw themselves as the key agents for accomplishing the idealistic task. Based on the critique of idealism, Cart forcefully made the case that power is an essential ingredient in politics and international politics are always power politics. Morality is relative and it is the product of power. Carr submitted that power has three key elements: the military component, the economic component and the power over opinion. The three categories of political power are closely interdependent, and further is difficult to imagine any state possessing one but not another for any length of time.Carr places great emphasis on the military elements of power in international politics, for " the uhima ratio of power in international politics is war". The foreign policy of a state is limited by its military strength. Carr notes links between the economic and military elements of power but argues that it is separable. For Carr, power determines morality, any international moral order must rest on some hegemony of power. Thus, great powers can formulate rules according to their own interests and standards and then spread them taking advantage of power. Meanwhile, great powers should seek a compromise and exchange interests with other states or disclaim part of vested interests to make others states in the international system accept them. In short, power has a decisive role in international politics, but morality must rest on some hegemony of power to find a foothold, thus it will be useful to stabilize international order.
英文专著，比较适合国际政治专业的学生和初级研究者使用